------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: [no-forced-vaccination] A TRIBUTE TO GENERAL STUBBLEBINE

Thank you for your kind words. I believe that each of us must follow
his truth or there is nothing left for all of us. That is what I
have done throughout my career, both in, and out of, the military.
Freedom, to which I dedicated my entire life, is, in fact,
indivisible. Health freedom is a core right of all humans. Thus,
the struggle.
I salute you for your work.
General Stubblebine

On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 4:27 AM, salvationscience
<salvationscience@...> wrote:

A TRIBUTE TO GENERAL STUBBLEBINE
FOR HIS WORK IN REMOTE VIEWING AND MEDICAL FREEDOM

I didn't know how to begin in the group of such an illustrious man.
Codex, the FDA, the AMA, and the global priority for money first -
before life itself, has become a great concern to us. I have not had
time to read the messages here at the no-forced-vaccine group, except
to note that their titles reveal they are very erudite. I hope the
messages below will equal such quality.

We are not blind to the simple fact that Remote Viewing and Medical-
Dietary Freedom are of utmost importance to the "True Faith", and
thus are part of the prime directive, expressed in the American
Pledge of Allegiance to God and country. I am about to prepare a
report concerning the struggle for Urine Therapy in Viet Nam. I hope
you will enjoy it. For now, God bless us all. Jai Om. - Sw.
Tantrasangha

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ChineseTao/message/975
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ChineseTao/message/1174
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/NATURAL_CURES/message/1256
-------------------------------------------------------------------

THE IRRATIONAL TABOO AGAINST THE NEW, STRANGE AND UNKNOWN
http://www.salvationscience.com

Psychics' Fears of Psychic Powers by Charles T. Tart
(1986, Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research.)
http://www.paradigm-sys.com/ctt_articles2.cfm?id=74

The dog loves his familiar but cruel master, who never feeds him,
and, growling, bites the hand of the unusual kind stranger who tries
to give him a steak. Similarly, the prospect for eternal life in
physical immortality, is more frightening to most than death itself!
This "Death Wish" is at the core of the rejection of the Inner
Christ of Salvation from Suffering by Way of a Longer, Happier Life.
One must be strong, take heart, and strive to be Righteous in every
Way. Otherwise, your existence has no positive purpose or value, and
the world would be better off without you.

This antichrist spirit of fear of the unknown and fear of being
proven wrong, is really "nuts", and it's practically universal in
this death-trap world, in which there are more people trying to hurt
you than help you. Having misery inside, they would transfer the
emotion outwards to you, much like a suicide bomber, destroying both
subject and object at the same time. Thus, they give of themselves
their own inner poverty of character. Similarly, but on the
contrary, from Inner Bliss, Love flows outwards to one's neighbor.
Jai Om. - Sw. Tantrasangha

[This paper was originally published under the above title in the
Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 1986, Vol.
80, No. 3, pp. 279-292.] (see detail)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
Abstract

Preliminary research suggests that ordinary people, as well as
parapsychologists, may have preor unconscious fears of psi that
affect their thinking about and reactions to it. What about people
who are very heavily involved with psi in their daily lives, that
is, psychics? This paper surveys the fears and ambivalences about
psi of people who have worked on becoming psychic in the context of
an interest in personal growth. Fears expressed focus on the unknown
quality to which psi opens one, loss of control, giving power to
others to validate or invalidate one, confusion resulting from
malicious invalidation, distortions of self and psychic functioning
resulting from the need to please, forced self-changes, succumbing
to others' emotions, lack of criteria for validation of unusual
experiences, maladaptive loss of ordinary fears, fear of success,
isolation resulting from an inability to communicate, invalidation
of conventional work ethic values, frightening others, becoming ill
from taking on others' problems, and problems in handling new sorts
of power.

Article

On the surface, scientific discussion of the existence and nature of
psi presumes that the parties to the discussion are rational people,
operating at a purely intellectual level in their examination of
relevant facts and theories. Both I and others have argued that, to
the contrary, almost everyone has strong emotional attitudes towards
psi (Batcheldor, 1966, 1984; Eisenbud, 1963, 1970, 1972, 1979,1982,
1983; Harary, 1985; Isaacs, 1984; LeShan, 1966; Pearce, 1974; Rogo,
1977; Servadio, 1958; Tart, 1980, 1983a, 1983b, 1984a, 1984b,
1984c). Because these attitudes are partially to fully unconscious
or otherwise not explicitly recognized, they seriously distort
ostensibly rational discussions about psi. As I have argued
elsewhere (Tart, 1984a), the first step toward correcting this
situation is conscious recognition and acceptance of both one's own
and others' emotional attitudes toward psi. One process that can
further both of these steps is the deliberate study of others'
attitudes. Toward this end, I have reported observations gathered
from participants in workshops I have given on psi (Tart, 1983a) and
from a mixed student and community population more typical of the
populations commonly used in parapsychological research (Tart &
Labore, 1986). This paper reports on ambivalent and negative
attitudes toward psi in a special group: people whose positive
attitudes toward and interest in psi are sufficiently strong for
them to undertake long training to become psychics. Often this
interest is strong enough that they come to earn at least part of
their living as professional psychics.

A SAMPLE OF PSYCHICS

The term "psychic" in this paper will generally mean a person who
believes he or she can pick up information by one or more kinds of
ESP and/or affect things by some sort of PK, with either of these
abilities developed to a sufficiently reliable level to be of
practical use. The participants in this study were students and
former students of Helen Palmer, a well-known Berkeley psychic and
personal friend of mine. Helen Palmer earns her living by doing
psychic readings for clients, and she is so successful at this that
her waiting list for appointments usually runs for a year or more.
She has a Master's degree in psychology but did not discover her
psychic abilities until after her formal education was completed.
Her readings emphasize the personal growth implications of her
impressions as being much more important than dwelling on the
psychic (in the sense of finding out things about the client not
normally known to the reader) aspects of her impressions. She has
taught a variety of psychic and personal development courses for
several years and has a number of long-term students. Her students
also have strong commitments to their own and others' personal and
spiritual growth, although there is wide variation and eclecticism
in their particular psychic, personal, and spiritual growth
practices. As of her students expressed it during the data-
collection discussion, In Helen's emphasis, you don't work on
yourself in order to become a better psychic reader, you work on
being a psychic reader in order to work on yourself. Learning to
read clearly is a way of learning to work with your own energy and
self. This particular group of respondents may or may not be typical
of other people who would consider themselves psychic. Future
research will eventually have to consider sample characteristics
before generalizing results.

DATA COLLECTION

After several conversations about semiand unconscious fears of psi,
Ms. Palmer and I agreed it would be valuable to have a group session
with her students about this topic. We expected that this would not
only provide useful scientific data but also have some therapeutic
and growth implications for her students. We had both observed that
people who begin to recognize some of their fears of psi often
suffer unnecessarily because they think they are the only person
with such feelings and therefore "abnormal." Some participants did
subsequently report that it had been freeing and insightful to share
their fears and ambivalent feelings with sympathetic others. Lest
the focus on negative aspects of psi give a misleading impression of
Ms. Palmer and her students, it is important to note that, overall,
psi is a very positive topic for them. It is connected with vital
ideas and practices about spiritual growth and a complete life. The
present study focuses on what the students would consider one small
part of their reality. Fourteen people participated in a 2-hour
session. All discussion was tape-recorded and later transcribed.

Ms. Palmer introduced me to her students. I explained that (a) I had
found that many people had various kinds of fears of psi that could
be tapped with a little psychological probing, (b) I thought they
would be an especially interesting group to discuss this topic with
because of their extensive work with and commitment to psychic and
spiritual matters, (c) sharing their feelings about this would be
valuable in furthering our psychological understanding of and
ability to deal with fears of psi, and (d) Ms. Palmer and I thought
it would probably be helpful to their personal growth to share these
feelings. I promised that what they said was confidential in that
their names or facts that might specifically identify them would
never be released. We then had an informal discussion with various
people volunteering descriptions of feelings they had about psi and
others offering comments on their reactions to these feelings. I
acted as a moderator, occasionally asking people to elaborate on
their statements or feelings and moving the discussion forward when
a given topic started to go flat.

CONCERNS RELATED TO PSYCHIC AND SPIRITUAL DEVELOPMENT

In this paper I will report all concerns which were sufficiently
expressed to be understandable. Most, but not all, of these concerns
were shared by more than one person, as judged by head noddings,
facial expressions, or verbal comments. Many concerns deal with
perceived consequences of being psychic rather than psychic
functioning itself. As one person put it, "Being psychic per se no
longer freaks me out; it's auxiliary issues that being psychic
brings up." The responses were often eloquent, so aside from
grouping them, I will generally let them speak for themselves
without further comment. When my own remarks are quoted, italics
will be used to differentiate them from the comments of the
psychics. Each new paragraph indicates that a different person is
speaking.

Opening Up to the Unknown

When psi is turned on I don't know what's going to come up, and
that's out of control. I don't like that. We're talking [about how
psi affects your life] from the view of a rational person on the
path, not from that of someone who has transcended. We're in a great
limbo, a kind of purgatory. Where you haven't got the great
transcendental feedback to drive you on, you need to go on faith.
Once you get there, all that crazy stuff [like fears of the unknown]
grinds to a halt. What a relief! I am working on it [psi and
spiritual development] now with positive thinking, in the hope that
this will bias the function so only positive stuff will come up.
This should eliminate the fear as to whether I can handle the
information that will come up. Who knows what you might be opening
up to? It's a loss of ego. My husband is also psychic, and we took a
dive into real madness. We didn't know it until we landed in the
hospital. I can see the line [between sanity and insanity] now, but
I still have a fear of that happening again. You have to develop
faith. I wake up in the night energized. What I would do before
would [be] sit, let it clog in my head, my fears would rev up, my
hearing get acute, I would imagine someone was trying to get in the
house. Now I get up and try to move the energy, and I have nice
experiences with it. It's developing a faith for me that there is
something. It feels safe to go with the energy. But it's scary
taking the first step. You've got to build the base really strongly
with work on personality. Then the peak of the pyramid, the peak
experience, is not so scary. Support the ego, keep it real, and
sooner or later you will transcend, but you don't force
transcendence. The samadhi experiences, the heavy experiences, are
rare, they blow you out. Psychic reading is a cinch by comparison.
I'm very cautious [about] high energy states. Those who were opened
up with a big bang don't try to go back to it very much, but those
who are working their way up gradually keep trying to go [higher].

Loss of Control, Possession

Who knows what you might be opening up to? It's a loss of ego. My
first psi experiences were in Brazil, where psi stuff, mediumistic
stuff, is taken for granted. How can you let go of ego and let
something else come in to you and speak through you? The practice of
oriental-style meditation reduced that fear. Once I get out there,
will I be able to return?

Loss of Control of Life Direction

I can't differentiate now between "This is rational life" and "This
is psychic life." I started "running energies" a few years ago,
charged all of my chakras and "went out." It's hard to describe: it
was very profound. I don't fear death anymore, I know good exists.
The next day my girlfriend didn't recognize me I was changed so
much. I could have gone there again the next night, but I had to put
some brakes on it; I felt the fear of having to lose control of my
life. It would be carried somewhere else in a radical way, and I
wasn't ready to go there yet. My choice was that I wasn't ready yet.
It will come back when I'm ready, but it was fear that kept me back
then.

Giving Power to Others to Validate or Invalidate One

Like doing a reading was once a big deal. That was 12 years ago. Ego
fears: Is this correct? Am I doing a good job? After [a] time [of]
just getting the courage to do it, then the fear went into another
area. The fear is in the paralysis, not in the state, not in the
action. It was frightening to begin doing readings. I usually kept
my psychic stuff to myself, but now I'd have to say something and
wait to see if the other person would validate it. It's like
exposing myself. Especially if you're going on and on without
getting any feedback. Like taking a dive off a cliff. They might
think I was crazy. I could be really humiliated by saying all these
wild things. I had to deal with it by just keep[ing] doing it and
doing it. I have a lot of self-doubt. I always wonder after a
reading if I've made it up. I've learned to just give the info and
ask the client to give me feedback later on, like days later. I use
this to strengthen my confidence in hanging in there. In doing a
reading you're giving someone a large amount of power to validate or
invalidate you: That's scary! Yes!

Confusion, Invalidation From Others' Refusal to Validate

When being psychic gets mixed up with other crap going on in life,
it's freaky. I grew up getting all the emotional stuff in the
family, and when I'd try to find out [if they really felt that way],
they'd deny it, invalidate my perceptions. They'd deny it. It drove
me crazy. I would embellish it, too, but could never get the
feedback to figure out what was my embellishment and what was
correct perception. When you get psychic stuff and people refuse to
validate it, that's horrible! [Laughter and head nodding indicated
general agreement.] Not only do people deliberately withhold
validation, often their own fixations are such that they don't know
what is the truth.

Note that the term "fixations" used above and in some subsequent
quotes is used in a technical sense to denote particular
personality/ego types on the enneagram of ego fixations (see Lilly &
Hart, 1983), a system used by many of these psychics as part of
their personal growth work.[1]

Distortions From the Need to Please

A person who was of a fixation type with a strong need to please
other people (Ego Plan in the Enneagram system of personality types)
commented:

I'd want everything to be OK for the person I was reading for, and
when it wasn't that raised a bunch of personality issues for me. I'm
in Aikido and Reichian therapy to help get grounded [although they
raise issues too], and all I can do is keep sticking with it. I have
to fight the desire to make everything OK, it is a block to the
psychic stuff, it makes me give bad information. I can help people
more if I tell them what I really see.

Forced Self-Change

Fear that if you do get through to [the] other side you will be
unalterably changed. I'm afraid of that. I got into this to read
other people, but the effects on the readers' personality are more
profound than on the people you read for. It's constantly bringing
up your own noise and ego in ways you have to sit with. You're going
to get nailed for that in this work, your ego stays 6 inches in
front of your nose! What's special about psychic reading that brings
up your personality, compared to, say, interpreting a psychological
test, where you can be relatively impersonal? Each of us is an
instrument, but that instrument is really flawed by your own
[personality] fixation. To really give a good reading you have to
know what is your fixation, what is the client's fixation. You have
to change yourself to improve. I used to be afraid of new openings
because of the issues they would raise, but now I'm not afraid of
them. I read from my belly [referring to the idea or experience of
an important psychic center in the belly, the Japanese "hara", which
is different from most people. It makes me feel close and intimate
with people, and that's splendid. It's scarier to deal with the real
world. A new scary thing is using the process of psychic reading to
work on yourself instead of on other people. Ask it about your own
personal issues. Now it's feeling like a viable solution. Helen
finds that you think you are afraid of the psychic stuff or of the
other state, but it's actually your personality afraid it can't
integrate it, not the phenomena or state per se.

Picking Up and Succumbing to Others' Emotions

Sensing other's fears can make me sick for days sometimes. I have to
use special techniques to get rid of them. It's important to learn
to distinguish between yourself and others in order to not get
confused over what are your feelings, or get carried away by others'
feelings. When I was more attached to people this led to great
confusion, but as I've learned to get detached, it's easier to
distinguish. For me the confusion with others comes when I'm all up
in my head, but as I learn to get more into my body, it's easier to
keep the distinction. We did a group training reading on one person
once. At the end of the reading I was so angry, and I didn't know
why. Then I realized it was the readee's anger I had picked up, and
I realized that's what I did: I picked up the client's energy and
ran it through me. Then I had to learn how to get rid of unwanted
pickup. How do I protect myself? I was wondering once why my
clientele wasn't increasing. I knew I was good. Ann Armstrong [a
well-known California psychic] gave me feedback: I walked in and I
was real clean and real pure and that would freak people out! They
would project themselves on to me, and they were afraid of
themselves. What I do now is disconnect from that space, fake being
ordinary. I have to be ordinary in an ordinary way, not what had
become my way of being "ordinary," but by the usual social
standards. Clients started coming in! I had to adapt my energy to
the client. Are you saying the energy you let out from being in a
different space of being, a psychic space, freaked people out, quite
aside from whether you actually said a word to them? [Nodded
agreement.]

How Do You Validate Experience?

What is Reality?

When I discovered that what I thought to be true about the psychic
was really true, it grounded me a lot, made it much less fearful. A
more fearful issue is when you start to get into other realities, to
make more profound changes in yourself, then what validates your
reality? You can't even trust the support of the people you're with,
that you love, because what differentiates that from a cult? You're
far from the realities of your culture! What feedback can you
believe? Do I keep on, or am I crazy? Is this it, or am I crazy?
This is the big issues. That's the reason for working on yourself.

Losing Adaptive Ordinary World Fears

You may get so "high" from psychic spaces that when you go out into
the ordinary world you aren't discriminating, you're too accepting,
and that can get you into trouble. All those wonderful cans of
tomatoes in the store! You can get hooked on that state! You're
feeling so good, and here's this 2,000 pounds of car coming down the
street! A fear that you're not going to be afraid when you should
be! You should, but you're not, that's the problem. A funny fear,
you don't feel fear, but your mind knows you should be objectively
afraid. You know you're being inappropriate. I like to spend some
time with conservative friends who don't believe in any of this
every couple of weeks, it's checking in on what the rules are!

Isolation From Ordinary People

I was feeling really isolated for a while, my friends would say "You
know that already" or the like, it was disconcerting for people to
feel you were scanning them all the time. That kind of dissolution
might not feel so bad if you're in a group that supports that and
you, but if you're out there alone, it's kind of spooky. This calls
for a tremendous act of faith, with no feedback. Everyday life can
be made difficult. When I go to college functions with my husband I
go by his name, not my psychic practice name, to avoid the
complications and rejections I would otherwise run in to. I don't
open myself.

Fear of Success

Using it to guide myself it will lead me to success, and that brings
up my fears of success. Fear of success in the psychic is like fear
of success in psychotherapy. The closer you get to success in either
case, the more the personality fights back, putting these
obstructions up.

Unknown Changes in the Self

You fear that if you do get through to other side you will be
unalterably changed, and you're afraid of that.

Inability to Communicate

A fear that you won't be able to express your experience. A fear
that you will be able to express it, but it won't make sense to
anybody.

Invalidating Conventional Work Ethic Values

We've always been taught to get to something the hard way. Not to
use intuition. No support for intuition, and using it invalidates
all the investment in conventional ways of doing things. How would
you like to have it 100%? It's too easy then! Why have I worked so
hard in the world if it's that easy! At it's extreme you end up as
an empty site for the manifestations of the Great Power. The ego
dissolves. When you start to approach that, it's wonderful from one
perspective, but it's also I'm not here, it is coming through, so
what's the point of me? Just one more atom now I'm gone, so what?
All my friends are still out there doing things.

Frightening Others

Any time you bring anything up from the "other world," so to speak,
it scares them. I have to be real careful. I feel other people's
body reactions real quick. What are they scared of? Their own stuff!
When I've exposed myself to the wrong people it scares them. Being a
seven [Ego Plan fixation type], the narcissus-type thing happens and
then I get scared to death. Often I don't say much, I just sit there
serenely, but it gets to people. When you're centered you're very
detached, it takes a lot of energy to animate yourself. I do body
work also and am a healer also. I can touch someone and remove a
block. People do feel it when I touch them. I don't do it until I
feel they are ready to handle the issues around this, issues of
power, etc. I work with the issues that come up, they do get afraid
of it. I've been called a lot of names, like witch. I remember a
time when a healing was done on me and I thought about what was
happening; it was scary. I used to do this defensively to get rid of
people. I would register their negativity and then manifest it, and
it would get rid of them. Sounds weird, but it was a marvelous
defense mechanism. Presented me in the negative, but got rid of
them. It was involuntary for a period of my teens.

Getting Sick From Taking On Others' Problems

Sensing others' fears can make me sick for days sometimes. I have to
use special techniques to get rid of them. I had an extreme problem
with this confusion, the more I learned to blend and merge with
people and making sure they liked me, the worse it got. I would do a
reading and get sick. I was sick for a year in one period. If they
had an ear ache, two days later I had an earache.

Fears of PK-Like Psi

The issue of PK-like psi abilities, with which one could change the
world and people, rather than just psychically sense them, was not
raised until late in the evening. Although it was not pursued at any
length, the comments are of considerable interest. Let's raise the
trick question of magic. If others begin to feel you don't just read
them, you affect them, how do you feel? Or if you begin to feel this
yourself, how do you feel? I deal with this by just thinking
positive source, these things come from God. If I could feel energy
and it felt good for someone I just felt it was from God. [Several
people say "Yes!"] Helen remembers a woman who stood on the roof and
yelled at her, and when she fought against it, the woman was worse.
She had to learn to think positive thoughts at her, and then things
would settle down. That works for me. I've had the same experience
with a neighbor who's a juvenile delinquent. Everybody here is
working with the light side of the energy. In Brazil I've seen the
dark side, I've seen people die from this, but you have to be
receptive to it, believe that it will harm you. The energy is there,
how you use it depends on you. If I could always get what I wanted
from magical affirmations or the like, well it would be too easy
then! Why have I worked so hard in the world if it's that easy! It
makes me realize that in my life I have to put in a lot more
positive feeling about people. That makes me feel better about
affirmations, because if they come true it's all right for people.

Temptations and Problems of Power

The issue of evil.

This group isn't surrounded by people who are into serious evil,
murders, etc. The only experience I've had that's even remotely
close to this is someone I knew who had studied psychic stuff a lot.
Friends of mine in this group had given her a reading and she used
her abilities to block them. She had the ego satisfaction of
enjoying the fact that she had the power to block them. It bothers
me that you can have that kind of power but still that kind of
allegiance to ego. That kind of ego hasn't grown with the energy.
This is a sheltered group, but I have no reason not to believe that
you can have combinations of power and immature egos. I've seen
teachers where there's been a problem with their use of power. I
stopped after I initially started reading because it raised issues
of power: Could I take responsibility for the way I was affecting
people? I needed to deal with those before I went on. I have a real
problem with things that make me feel special or separate me from
people. I keep wanting to say this is not my ego, I'm a channel.
Other people have this ability even if they're not manifesting it.
I've tried a couple of times fighting fire with fire, and I
immediately realized the ramifications to my own personality. If I
did that I would become totally paranoid that it was being done to
me! It was an immediate feedback. That's not acceptable, So I send
out lots of positive vibes to people who are bugging me, I ask that
they be healed. That seems to work. I had a difficult interaction
with my father-in-law, who felt that what I was doing was probably
fraudulent, or at least aberrated. I felt an intense suppressed rage
from him. It felt like a hex of a kind, you get these big blocks of
negative energy coming at you. That energetic current that goes into
repressed energy can be directed, but it's much better to release it
than fight it on its own ground. If somebody hates me I can feel
validated, more important. I worked in another psychic group before
I met Helen, and they were always working to protect themselves,
someone was always after you. Someone taught me a technique for
fighting fire with fire. It worked. It gave me a sense of my own
power, but I immediately left that group. It took so much energy!
When you get receptive to it you pick it up so much more. It's
clearly there, but you don't have to tune into it. If you keep your
vibes high, you won't tune into it. Are you here to be of service,
or what? There are groups around that attract students who are
vulnerable, then they have to protect themselves, this attracts more
attacks, you have to bolster yourself more, you need the support of
the groups, etc., etc. to keep the guard up.

PERSPECTIVE ON THE FEAR OF PSI

A natural result of reading all these negative feelings and fears is
to start thinking of this group as very fearful of psi. This would
not be correct. Remember these are people who are actively seeking
psychic development as part of their personal and spiritual growth.
We had a specialized focus on the negative, so naturally it
predominated. To partially restore balance, note the following two
remarks: I'm a Four [fixation-type Melancholic, with a strong
tendency to overdramatize], and I find the psychic stuff a way of
getting a solid reality, giving me a perspective on the nuttiness of
everyday life. I am terrified of everyday reality, there are
terrible things out there, it's much safer in my own mind! Psi stuff
does raise things in your personality that may take 20 years to
adjust to, but the world news is what's really terrifying!

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study add to those of earlier ones in
giving us the beginnings of a catalog of the fears people have about
psi and psychic functioning. In an earlier study (Tart & Labore,
1986), a mixed group of college students and townspeople were
interviewed about feelings related to psi-like abilities, as
elicited by their participation in a "belief experiment." About half
of them were asked to temporarily believe and then react to the idea
that they could undergo a safe procedure that would permanently make
them fully aware of all the thoughts and feelings of everyone within
a 100-yard radius. Reactions were predominantly negative and covered
such feelings as concern for being able to control the ability, fear
of incapacitating overload, concern for the responsibility that
knowledge obtained in this way would bring, concern as to whether
they were mature enough to handle such an ability, ethical concerns
about violating others' privacy, and fears about what other people
would think of them when their ability became known. The other half
were asked to believe and react to the idea of a PK-like ability,
being able to move anything within a 100-yard radius that they could
normally move with their body by thought alone. There was more
concern with what others might do with such an ability than with
what the respondent might do, as well as concern with whether they
could adequately control this ability and whether the procedure for
inducing it was really safe. These seem to be primarily concerns
about the psi ability itself, whereas the present group accepted the
psi abilities per se and were more concerned with longer-term
consequences, especially as they related to personal and spiritual
growth. Together they map out a broad spectrum of concern about psi
abilities that has not been adequately explored. I have let these
data speak for themselves, but I shall conclude by quoting from part
of the conclusion of my recent article, "Acknowledging and Dealing
with the Fear of Psi":

"One of the great discoveries of modern psychology is that
unconscious processes exist and that they cannot be effectively
handled by pretending that they are not there. I believe that
unconscious fear of psi is very strong among parapsychologists, as
well as people in general. This unacknowledged fear is a primary
reason for the generally trivial manifestation of psi in our
laboratories, and it will continue to stifle progress in our field
until it is acknowledged and dealt with. There may be real reasons
for fearing some aspects of psi, such as potential military
applications (Tart, 1978, 1979), but dealing effectively with such
real problems will not be possible if our unacknowledged personal
fears are unresolved. (Tart, 1984a, pp. 141142)"
I see conscious and unconscious fears of psi as a major problem but
an understandable and solvable one. I hope others will join in the
research needed for such understanding and solution. Then we will
make more progress in understanding the vital, positive aspects of
psi, which, for me, far outweigh the negative aspects focused on in
this paper.

Department of Psychology
University of California, Davis
Davis, California 95616

End Notes

Note 1: Briefly, this system conceptualizes nine basic personality
types, each resulting from a defensive strategy adopted in early
childhood to preserve an individual's essential self from the trauma
and pressure of the enculturation process. The nine defense
mechanisms are reaction formation, repression, identification,
introjection, isolation, projection, sublimation, rationalization,
denial, and narcotization. The enneagram is a complex diagram first
introduced in the West by G. I. Gurdjieff (Ouspensky, 1949) and is
considered to represent basic laws that govern the interaction of
defensive patterns and, thus, ego types. The system is supposed to
be very ancient, but its modern version has been clarified and
updated by Claudio Naranjo, a psychiatrist (Naranjo, personal
communication, 1972). It is taught as an oral tradition and
primarily intended to be used for corrective work on oneself as a
foundation for spiritual growth.

http://www.paradigm-sys.com/ctt_articles2.cfm?id=74
http://www.salvationscience.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------

ANTICHRIST TOXINS: THE PRIME DIRECTIVE OF RELIGION IS HEALTH
http://www.salvationscience.com

A Treatise by James A. Ferrel M.D.

Take a special note about coffee makers that have boiling
hot water on plastic. It always boils down to people who don't give a
damn about other people - people who value money more than life
itself! Think of the enemies of health as a corporate "lobby", with
lots of employees and millions of dollars - who care more about money
than health. The only Way to combat this, is to form your own group,
with lots of people and money.

The problem is that people don't communicate with each other on these
life-and-death issues, let alone sacrifice of their time and money to
achieve the noble end of ensuring that such harmful practices do not
happen. A few of these harmful practices are: placing food and drink
in plastic containers, fluoridation of water, erroneous religious
practices, which cannot save anybody from anything, etc.

Most of us have long been aware of the suppression of a certain
religious interpretation and the socio-economic boycott and
persecution of its advocates. This is an ongoing crime that must be
prevented. This enmity against the good has been going on for over a
quarter century, without respite. The denial of this or lack of
confession about this crime can cause unforeseen problems for all.

Recall the the lesson we should have learned from the Nazis, who
sacrificed so many innocent people, thinking: "Better them than me",
until finally it came time for the bombs to fall on those who
commited these war crimes and THOSE WHO ALLOWED IT TO HAPPEN. Most of
us are aware that there is indeed a situation like this now in
America.

You simply must understand the "cause and effect" nature of what you
do (or don't do), for soon comes the "payback" time for those who did
not fulfill their Righteous duty to God and their fellow man. Good
security and untelligence should cause us to prepare for such an
eventuality. This recompense for the unrighteous would likely be
famine and pandemics.

That is why we warn you against what you have done for so long -
ignoring survival techniques, as taught in our yoga journal, called
Salvation Science or The Tantrayudha. If demons enjoyed hurting
Swamiji, did you really think you were exempt from the curse? Like
Jesus said: "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you, for
as you sow, so shall you reap". Jai Om. - Sw. Tantrasangha

Question: Have plastic food and beverage containers been proven safe?

Answer: No.

During the film's graduation party in THE GRADUATE, Mr. McGuire pulls
Benjamin Braddock (Dustin Hoffman) aside to offer sage advice for his
future. His future would be one word: "plastics."

Of course, we all know Mr. McGuire's advice and prognostication was
correct. Plastics can only be made by man by virtue of his finite
wisdom, hence they are patentable. The profit in the manufacture of
plastics has been huge. Plastics are everywhere. Plastic
manufacturing now uses 4% of the world's oil production annually.
Automobiles are now 9% plastic. It is of my special concern that more
foods and beverages are being put into plastic containers. Plastics
are ubiquitous now. They persist and accumulate in our ATLAS
DRUGGED*, as their production exceeds their chemical degradation
rate. Harmful chemicals from plastics are now commonly found in
groundwater, waterways, and drinking water.

While standing out in the summer heat in Phoenix, Arizona in 1981, my
girlfriend asked me what was causing the film to form on the inside
of the windshield of her new Mazda 626. She said that she had to wipe
it off every morning so she could see to drive to work. I didn't know
then. I do now! It was phthalates, the chemical that was added to the
plastic dash cover to soften it and prevent cracking. I'm sure by now
most of the phthalate has evaporated into our atmosphere and the
Mazda is in some junkyard with a cracked up dash.

Phthalates are EDC's (Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals.) They are
chemicals found in recycle codes #1 through #6 plastics. Another EDC
(Bisphenol A) is
in recycle code #7 plastics. All of these types of plastic EDC's
interfere with the function of sex hormones receptors. In THE
GRADUATE Benjamin was quite a stud. I wonder if he's now taking one
of the popular drugs to treat erectile dysfunction, a disorder that
has become one of the many epidemics in our new plastic world.

In 2003 a group of Croatian scientists reported that phthalates in
plastics dissolved in various solutions. They used a variety of
plastic items, including plastic food containers. After 10 days of
sitting in distilled water, an average of 55.4 mg/ of phthalates from
each kilogram of plastic "migrated" into the water. To a lesser
degree the phthalates from plastics dissolved into acetic acid 3%
(44.4 mg/kg) and 10% ethyl alcohol (32.3 mg/kg).

The Croatian study shows what Benjamin would suspect, if he took
chemistry in college: Water is the universal solvent; and it
dissolves even the primarily fat soluble phthalates. The more that
you filter water to remove other toxic solutes, the more aggressive
water becomes in its power to reach osmolar equilibrium by dissolving
its non-inert containers.

What is also obviously missing from the Croatians' controlled, static
testing model are the temperature variations that the plastic bottled
water product goes through to get from bottling point to the mouth of
the consumer. Transport trucks probably reach a very high temperature
in the non refrigerated cargo areas that carry PETE (recycle code #1
plastic) bottled water in the summer. Heat facilitates the
dissolution of phthalates into the water. Then the bottles may be
stored for a much longer time than 10 days prior to consumption.
Furthermore, freezing the containers produces micro-fissures in the
interior surface of the plastic bottle container as the water
expands, exponentially exposing more solute surface area. Traumatic
handling or any motion of the package will further enhance diffusion.
Applying the laws of physics, all of these factors clearly by
extrapolation will increase the water dissolution of the plastic
containers.

Fatty foods in plastic containers are even more problematic, as fats
are absorbed differently and carry their phthalate solvents into our
bodies more easily. Phthalates bio-accumulate because of their fat
solubility. Phthalates concentrate in such fat organs in our bodies
such as brains, prostates, testicles, ovaries, breasts and,
unfortunately, breast milk. (The other popular food alternatives for
infants are worse. Commercial baby formulas are loaded with the
manmade phthalates.) I think the worst example of food containment in
plastic is milk. All milk except non-fat milk contains fat. Cow milk
itself represents a major source of the fats ingested by the public,
especially children. Cattle concentrate these chemicals by
bioaccumulation because EDC's from plastics are ubiquitous in water
and most animal food sources. Meat and dairy products are therefore a
major contributor to this group of human food chain derived toxins,
regardless of their containment. It is now irresponsible to add more
phathalates to the products by putting the milk products in plastic
containers that add MORE EDC's. Cattle have intentionally
been "fattened up" by adding hormones AND unintentionally "fattened
up" more by the contamination of cattle food and water by EDC's. The
combination of these chemicals passed on to the consumers in
concentrated form in milk products will most likely exacerbate
obesity in humans that consume them as well. Our current scientific
knowledge and common sense screams for an end to consumer purchase of
milk bottled in plastics. Until milk companies have their products
quantitatively analyzed for these EDC's by competent independent
laboratories, my strong recommendation is to avoid purchase and
consumption of milk and dairy products contained in plastic.

Sadly, the Croatian authors' 2003 conclusions about the safety of
plastics were: "These (exposure) levels would not present a hazard
for human health, not even for a prolonged period of time." However,
what was deemed acceptable levels of phthalates in 2003 now is
recognized as "crystal clearly" too high.

Selective interpretations from the ACC (American Chemistry Council)
lead to this erroneously high level being "set" for past toxicity
standards. The ACC is an "industry group" advisor. It's much like the
wolf guarding the henhouse. Thanks to the ACC efforts, control
regulations placed upon this chemical class are minimal. An ongoing
perpetuation of phthalate approval for use in virtually everything,
including containment of food, has resulted. In fact, the
perpetuation of these mythological high safety standards has resulted
in the majority of our food being wrapped or contained in plastics
that leach EDC's into our foods.

The ACC's Phthalate Esters Panel is made up representatives from
BASF, Eastman Chemical, Exxon-Mobil Chemical, Ferro, and Teknor Apex
Corporations. After graduating, Benjamin could have gone to work for
any of these companies to share the wealth that plastics
manufacturing has reaped, instead of hanging around and sporting Mrs.
Robinson for the summer!

I love one of the rationalization examples the ACC makes on their
PHTHALATES INFORMATION CENTER webpage: "Thanks to phthalates, your
nail polish doesn't chip." I wonder if they are aware of
the "unexplained" high rate of breast cancer in manicurists. I also
wonder if they are aware that most breast tissues and breast cancers
have sex hormone receptors that are acted upon by the EDC's found in
plastics.

To further confuse the public, the ACC webpage also redefines the
PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE which in its un-perverted definition simply
is: A (chemical) should not be considered safe until it is proven
safe. Environmentalists who are trying to unravel the cause-effect
relationships of environment chemicals, to the otherwise unexplained
epidemics of various diseases now affecting man as well as every
species on our planet, encourage its application. The ACC's watered
down version suggests that cost effective, fearless risks are worth
taking.

Can the ACC keep up the phthalate safety illusion forever?

The American Tobacco Association almost got away with it!

See the old tobacco ad below. Hasn't history taught us anything about
toxins?

We now know that EDC's, like hormones themselves require very minute
amounts to have physiologic impact. EDC's are active in parts per
trillion! For example, the usual adult maintenance dose of
levothyroxine, a drug to replace depleted natural thyroid hormone in
hypothyroidism, is 1.6 micrograms/Kg/day. Why would I even think
about saying that a dose in the milligrams (1000 times as much as a
microgram) of a known EDC would be safe, especially for a child or
developing fetus?

We now know that phthalates also work in synergy with chemicals in
other classes to exert "more than additive" physiologic effects.

Previous experiments in rodents showed that high levels of phthalates
interfer with testosterone during gestation resulting in birth
defects of the genitalia, testicular cancer, and infertility in the
rats.

The ACC inspired acceptable level of phthalate myth should be blown
out of the water with a recent study completed by the University of
Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry. This study of 85 human
infant boys reported in May 2005 showed that phthalate levels found
normally in the general population adversely influenced sexual
development. The mothers of these infants had thier urine
quantatatively analyzed for metabolites of the phathalates. The
phthalate exposure these children had correlated with genital
abnormalities including smaller penis size and INCOMPLETE TESTICULAR
DESENT, which is a condition that greatly increases the risk of
testicular cancer if left untreated.

Solution 1 - Choose glass containers over plastic for purchase and
storage of food and beverages including milk and water.

American children can consume several milligrams of phthalate each
day.

I wonder if THE GRADUATE's Mr. Robinson noticed that most of the
teenage girls now-days have bigger breasts than his seductive wife
(gynecomastia), and that they begin thelarche (breast development)
and menarche (menstruation) at a significantly younger age, or that
many more have an endocrine pathology called PCOS (polycystic ovary
syndrome). In my opinion, children's exposure to phthlates in their
environment is the primary cause of recent increases of these
phenomena.

The chances of a woman getting breast cancer in her lifetime has
probably gone from a risk of less than 1 in 10 (10%) before THE
GRADUATE was made to a 1 in about 7.5 (13.2 %) rate today.

The choice to avoid food chain plastics is a "no-brainer" when you
understand how these chemicals persist and accumulate in our
environment, and how they function in our bodies!

Solution 2 - Choose stainless steel containers over plastic for
storage of food and beverages including water.

Unfortunately, we are past the point of no return with phthalates.
Just like cigarettes I think we'll have to live as prisoners with
their impact on future generations. The only defense we have at this
time is to individually choose to avoid them when we can, to mitigate
their effects on our health.

Phthalates clearly act upon hormone receptors in both men and women.
A concern is the potential phthalate impact on breast and other
hormone sensitive tissue in human females, but phthalate's
demasculinizing potential on males is more of a threat to all species
on the planet.

Unlike Mr. McGuire, I think we can choose a better future by avoiding
his "one word." We should start by trying to reduce plastics in our
food chain exposures.

Bottom line:
I would strongly advise consumers to purchase beverages and non-solid
food products packaged in glass rather than plastic if given the
choice.
-----------------------------
Dr. Ferrel is a board certified family physician and a certified
nutritional consultant who specializes in preventative and
environmental medicine. He currently resides in Phoenix, Arizona.
*ATLAS DRUGGED is an upcoming book by Dr. Ferrel.

http://www.salvationscience.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------

STATE SAMSARA: THE CONSEQUENCE OF NO GNOSTIC SANGHA
http://www.salvationscience.com

Manufacturing engenders many jobs and a lot of money, which has a lot
of clout in influence-peddling corporate lobbies. A Navy officer once
told me it was dangerous to mention "the Military-Industrial
Complex", because it was such a powerful "war lobby". Indeed, those
who manufacture war materials would be unhappy with any peacemaker,
and this fact means we shall go backwards - degenerating into
mindless animals, unless we do something about this problem.

So, what products does peace manufacture? Tractors instead of tanks?
In a materialistic world like ours, without a vested interest in
something, there can't be expensive bribes for Congressmen or people
of influence in government. Therefore, without capacity to organize,
since people are too obsessed with money and will not sacrifice of
themselves for a worthy cause, harmful vested interests will prevail
and will fill the vaccum of power left by the selfish and, therefore,
powerless.

In America, the people are the fourth and most important branch of
government. The other three branches exist only for them. But if the
people, through ignorance, selfishness, unrighteousness or cowardice,
renege on their civic duties to God and the people of the country, it
is certain that a tyrant will appear to fill that power vacuum. Like
Guru Rimpoche Padmasambhava prophesied of these Latter Days
(Daze): "The strength of communal unity is lost". For example, have
any of you Americans been able to find out what the government's debt
of $9 trillion was spent on? You have no voice at all in this matter!

Group empowerment is why Buddha formed the Sangha or Brotherhood.
That is why we Christians say in our liturgy: "I believe in the
Communion of Saints and the Forgiveness of sins". The original church
was to be a monastic commune, so that Gnostics could not be abused by
ignorant infidels. A good general knows when he is getting his ass
kicked and why. It is time we became aware of the cause of many
miseries - our own selfish lack of communication with our own fellow
man - in short, our own ignorant lack of organization.

Until we unite in Knowledge about Health and the Compassion to do
something about it, we will continue to be defrauded by unprincipled
traitors, who have betrayed the very Life Principle itself, and this
is an ongoing murder-suicide!. Perhaps I am only "throwing pearls
before swine", but I still have faith that some of you will attain
Gnosis (Knowledge of the Life Principle) and will seek to preserve it
unto future generations, who will benefit from your Righteous concern
for the welfare of all sentient beings, both now and in the future.
Jai Om. - Sw. Tantrasangha

Beyond Progressive Malpractice: Taking Down Big Pharma

by Ronnie Cummins
<http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/03/12/7636/>
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/03/12/7636/

Progressive Malpractice [noun]: ignoring the
fundamental economic and political roots of a
crisis; taking a single-issue, band-aid approach
in hopes of gaining mainstream support.

Libertarian Narcissism [noun]: promoting
individual solutions for collective problems;
believing that market pressure alone can bring
out-of-control corporations under control;
ignoring the plight of the poor; pretending major
problems can be solved without serious grassroots
organizing and government reform.

* * *

Welcome to Sicko Nation: Swimming in a toxic soup
of 100,000 synthetic chemicals-carcinogens,
neurotoxins, hormone disruptors, immune
suppressors, excitotoxins. Worn down by corporate
junk food, tainted consumer products, air and
water pollution, incessant advertising,
infectious disease, synthetic drugs, cigarette
smoke, and alcohol. Zapped 24/7 with
electromagnetic radiation. Stressed out by
poverty and economic insecurity, fear of crime,
rampant consumerism, and a murderous work pace. A
growing corps of Americans is chronically sick
and dispirited.

Aiding and abetting this massive assault,
mainstream medical practitioners, the corporate
media, and elected public officials ignore or
cover-up the toxic roots of Sicko Nation.
Money-grubbing politicians offer band-aid
solutions, and then proceed to collect their
rewards in the form of campaign contributions
from the pharmaceutical industry and HMOs (Health
Maintenance Organizations). Big Pharma spends
more on lobbying-$855 million between 1998 and
2006- than any other industry in the United
States, according to the Center for Public
Integrity. In addition Big Pharma feeds the
insatiable appetite of the mainstream media,
spending more than $70 billion dollars a year on
advertising. Last but not least, U.S. doctors
make more money than any other medical
practitioners in the world, though they typically
pay a steep price in terms of a 70-hour workweek,
skyrocketing malpractice insurance, and
indentured servitude to HMOs and giant hospitals.
The Emperor of ill health has no clothes, but
very few of our so-called leaders are talking
seriously about what to do about it.

American consumers and employers will spend over
two trillion dollars this year on health
insurance, pharmaceutical drugs, and medical
bills, yet we will remain-mentally and
physically- among the unhealthiest people on
Earth. Forty-eight percent of U.S. men and 38% of
women can now look forward to getting cancer.
Eight percent of our children suffer from serious
food allergies, 17% are diagnosed with learning
or behavior disabilities, and a third of
low-income preschool kids are already overweight
or obese. Heart disease, diabetes, mental
illness, cancer, and obesity are spiraling
out-of-control among all sectors of the population.

The fundamental causes of most of our chronic
health problems are not genetic or inherited, but
rather derive from couch potato/commuter
lifestyles; over consumption of highly processed,
high-cholesterol, nutritionally deficient, and
contaminated industrialized foods; and an
increasingly polluted, stressful, and toxic
environment. These, of course, are problems that
even the most expensive prescription drugs and
high-tech medical procedures cannot cure.
Unfortunately the worst is yet to come. Within
eight years, according to the Kaiser Family
Foundation, America's health care costs will soar
to $4.1 trillion annually, bankrupting Medicare
and millions of American families and businesses.
Unless we quickly change our priorities from
"maintaining" our Sicko Nation to universally
preventing disease and promoting overall
wellness-including cleaning up our food supply
and environment-America's health crisis will
become terminal. This means we must put an end to
tunnel vision, single-issue health care politics
and roll up our sleeves to take on the real
culprits: out-of-control corporations, politicians,
and technology.

With millions of Americans mentally or physically
debilitated, permanently hooked on the world's
most expensive prescription drugs, Big Pharma,
HMOs, and insurance tycoons rake in billions.
<http://www.nybooks.com/articles/17244>According
to Dr. Marcia Angell, former editor in chief of
the New England Journal of Medicine, in 2002,
"The combined profits for the ten drug companies
in the Fortune 500 ($35.9 billion) were more than
the profits for all the other 490 businesses put
together ($33.7 billion). Over the past two
decades the pharmaceutical industry has [become]
a marketing machine to sell drugs of dubious
benefit, [using] its wealth and power to co-opt
every institution that might stand in its way,
including the US Congress, the FDA, academic
medical centers, and the medical profession itself."

To put it bluntly we must put the "fear of the
grassroots" into the minds of Congress and the
nation's 172,000 elected public officials. But we
will only be able to accomplish this if can move
beyond progressive malpractice and libertarian
narcissism. The critics of corporate health care
and Big Pharma must stop quibbling, close ranks,
and mobilize a massive united front of the
progressive single-payer health care movement,
representing the 100 million Americans with no or
inadequate health insurance; reinforced by an
army of radicals and libertarians, the 50 million
alternative heath consumers who have rejected Big
Pharma's trillion-dollar drug and heath
maintenance scam altogether. Unless we bring
together liberals, radicals, and libertarians,
and mobilize this new majority, we will fail.

The toxic side effects of Sicko Nation are
poisoning the body politic. With much of the
population fixated on their health and
psychological problems, worried about losing
their jobs or their health coverage, doped up on
prescription drugs or alcohol, and, for many,
compensating for their alienating jobs with
rampant consumerism, politicians and corporations
run amuck. National and global
mega-crises-climate change, peak oil, and endless
war-steadily grow worse. Outgunned and
out-maneuvered, public interest organizations
have defensively barricaded themselves in their
respective single-issue silos-competing rather
than cooperating, seldom if ever making the
crucial links between food, environment,
lifestyle, work, tax policy, military spending,
and health. Intimidated and/or bought off by Big
Pharma and the medical industrial complex, few of
the nation's elected public officials-and none of
the major Presidential candidates-dare talk about
the obvious solution to our national health
crisis: universal health care with a preventive
and holistic focus.

We need universal, publicly funded health care
because millions of sick and disadvantaged
Americans are suffering and dying. We need
universal health care because Big Pharma, HMOs,
and insurance companies are gouging consumers for
two trillion dollars a year, profitably
"maintaining" their illnesses, rather than curing
them, steadily moving the nation along a
trajectory that, combined with out-of-control
military spending and corporate tax evasion, will
eventually bankrupt the economy.

In every industrialized country in the world,
except for the United States, medical care is
considered a basic human right, alongside food
and shelter, which a civilized society must
provide for all. Of course it's very difficult
for a corporate-indentured government like the
U.S. to afford universal health care, if big
pharmaceutical companies and HMOs are allowed to
jack up their profit margins at will, while the
rich and the corporations are allowed to evade
taxes. Health care reform in the U.S. must be
coupled with price controls on drugs and medical
costs, as well as tax reform, whereby the
corporations and the wealthy are forced to pay
their fair share of federal taxes. In the U.S.
corporations paid almost 40% of all federal taxes
in 1943. Now they pay less than 10%. In 1960,
millionaires were taxed at the rate of 90%. Now
the top rate for millionaires and billionaires is
35%. Putting an end to this institutionalized tax
evasion is a prerequisite for being able to
afford publicly funded universal health
care-without raising taxes for the middle class
and the poor.

* * *

The Cure: Disease Prevention & Complimentary Medicine

But government funded universal health care
(exemplified by John Conyers' currently stalled
bill in the House, HR 676 ("Non-Profit Medicare
for All") is not enough. We need non-profit
universal health care that promotes wellness and
prevents people from getting sick-before they end
up in the hospital or become permanently addicted
to expensive prescription drugs with dangerous
side effects. Simply giving everyone access to
Big Pharma's overpriced drugs, and corporate
hospitals' profit-at-any-cost tests and
treatment, will result in little more than
soaring health care costs, with uninsured and
insured alike remaining sick or becoming even sicker.

To cure Sicko Nation and revitalize the body
politic, we will need to build up a comprehensive
not-for-profit public health system that not only
guarantees everyone access to health care, but
makes the life or death connections between food,
diet, and health; exercise and health; exposure
to toxics and health; stress reduction and health;
and poverty and health.

As fifty million organic consumers and
alternative health consumers can attest,
complimentary and preventive medicine, utilizing
natural herbs, minerals, food based supplements,
organic whole foods, lifestyle changes, and
holistic healing practices is safe, affordable
and effective. Preventive health care, natural
medicine, and proper nutrition have been linked
to a broad range of health and social benefits,
including disease reduction, increased academic
performance, and lower health care costs.
Unfortunately, a large percentage of the U.S.
population lacks access to health care,
complimentary medicine, and healthy foods. The
only solution to this unacceptable situation is
to shift to a single-payer, publicly financed,
prevention-based, universal health care system.
The $350 billion in savings that will occur by
eliminating the profit motive and moving to a
single-payer system will allow us to insure and
promote the health and wellness of our entire
population.

In addition, scientific evidence is mounting that
Americans' daily exposure to 100,000 different
synthetic chemicals (less than 10% of which have
ever been safety tested) in our food, water,
medicines, body care products, cosmetics, toys,
home environments, etc. are undermining our
health and fueling an epidemic of debilitating
and deadly diseases including cancer, heart
disease, asthma, allergies, obesity, and chemical
sensitivities.

Of course we still need conventional medicine and
practitioners: hospitals, diagnostic tests,
surgeons, and specialists, as well as preventive
and holistic healers. I am a vocal advocate for
organic food and integrative medicine, but if I
suffer a heart attack, break my leg, or get shot
in an anti-war demonstration, I want to be taken
to a well-equipped and staffed hospital, not to a
health food store or my local acupuncturist. But
after my hospital treatment I don't want to
become a prescription drug junky or be driven
into bankruptcy court by a $100,000+ hospital bill.

To restore public health and bring Big Pharma to
heel will require, as a minimum first step, that
we organize a broad united front between the
nation's 100 million supporters of single-payer
health insurance (many of whom have an outdated
or conservative belief system regarding the
relative effectiveness of conventional versus
alternative medicine), and the more radical,
often libertarian, 50 million alternative health
consumers and practitioners–who typically hate
Big Pharma and the entire medical industrial
complex with a passion.

This united front will require us to move beyond
current "progressive malpractice," whereby
single-payer health care activists work in
isolation from alternative health consumers,
often dismissing complimentary medicine and its
advocates as "snake oil salesmen." Similarly
"libertarian narcissism" is just as
counter-productive: alternative health
enthusiasts who basically say "to hell with all
government programs" and "socialized medicine,"
in effect ignoring the plight of 50 million poor
and low-income Americans who have little or no
access to healthy food, nutrition and health
information, or access to quality health care.
Beyond uniting liberal, radical, and libertarian
critics of Big Pharma and the medical industrial
complex, the entire activist rainbow, including
environmentalists, trade unionists, tax
reformers, peace activists, and other
progressives will have work hand in hand to treat
and cure our profoundly sick nation.

Forty-seven million Americans currently have no
health insurance, while 50 million more of us are
woefully underinsured. Unfortunately, being able
to afford conventional health insurance yourself
or getting it through your employer may not help
you very much, since Big Pharma and
profit-obsessed HMOs and hospitals are focused
mainly on selling you overpriced (often
hazardous) prescription drugs ($300 billion a
year), running expensive tests, and basically
keeping you on permanent health maintenance,
rather than preventing and/or curing our most
common ailments such as cancer, hypertension,
heart disease, lung problems, diabetes, obesity,
stroke, and mental illness. Rampant medical
malpractice and the failure of conventional
medicine to address our serious ailments is the
primary reason that 50 million alternative health
consumers are taking matters into their own hands
and paying $30 billion dollars a year out of
their own pockets for complimentary medical
supplements and practitioners.

Even worse than just expensively
maintaining-rather than curing-chronic illnesses,
the collateral damage of Big Pharma's business as
usual can only be described as catastrophic. As
an AMA (American Medical Association) publication
admitted a decade ago, drug related "problems"
kill. 198,815 people, put 8.8 million in
hospitals, and account for up to 28% of hospital
admissions." Over the past decade this carnage
has increased. Newsweek magazine, among others,
has reported that side effects from
www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_9684.cfm>
prescription drugs are now the fourth leading cause
of death in the U.S. As medical analyst Gary Null
warns: "A definitive review and close reading of
medical peer-review journals, and government health
statistics shows that. the number of people
having in-hospital, adverse drug reactions (ADR)
to prescribed medicine is 2.2 million .the number
of unnecessary antibiotics prescribed annually
for viral infections is 20 million. The number of
unnecessary medical and surgical procedures
performed annually is 7.5 million. The number of
people exposed to unnecessary hospitalization
annually is 8.9 million.

The problem is clear. The solution is obvious.
The trillion-dollar life or death question is
whether we can overcome our sectarian divisions
and mobilize the grassroots power of the 150
million Americans who are sick and tired of
living in a Sicko Nation. Can we heal the
perennial split between proponents of
conventional medicine and the alternative health
consumer movement? Can progressives and
libertarians reach out to the economically
disadvantaged and stressed-out majority to create
a massive grassroots pressure that will literally
force the politicians to "do the right thing?"

The time for action is now. To begin the long
overdue process of "pressing the politicians"
please join thousands of other consumers and
taxpayers and go to
www.grassrootsnetroots.org>www.grassrootsnetroots.org
where you can click a button to send a
comprehensive Universal Health Care Candidate
Survey to your state and federal elected public
officials and candidates running for office in
2008. Once you've "pressed the politicians," an
on-line organizer from the Grassroots Netroots
Alliance will contact you.

Ronnie Cummins is the
<http://www.organicconsumers.org/>Organic
Consumers Association's National Director.

http://www.salvationscience.com
----------------------------------------------------------------

WAS WRIGHT WRONG? TAKE THE LIE DETECTOR TEST!
http://www.abcnews.go.com
http://www.salvationscience.com

Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama's own Chicago
minister, the Reverend Wright, has denounced America, saying: "God
damn America!" Why would an ex-marine, who is a "man of God", say
such a thing? Was Rev. Wright somehow right in doing so, or was
Wright wrong?

I once met a U.S. government agent, with a high security clearance,
who, upon witnessing my persecution by the U.S. government overseas,
told me: "The United States is the sorriest nation on earth!" I
answered him: "Your statement is not treasonous, because you say it
with every wish and intention that it be otherwise."

I observe that it is the true patriots who complain most about the
vile acts of the treasonous "blaspheming Goliath" majority. The
ironic twist is that such complaints are misconstrued as themselves
treasonous, thus slandering such vocal true patriots, while devils
masquerade as the real patriots.

This is one of the many ways that the Righteous, with all their
complaints about demonic control of the world, are seen as wrong. And
this is how those who are wrong are seen as right, and are as "wolves
in Lamb's clothing", while the intellectually blind can only see the
outer appearance, and fail to see the inner evil.

Swamiji has long favored America's enemies - not as subversion
against the homeland, but as diplomatic peace overtures. And Swamiji
has long favored non-Christian religions for the same reason, and
because Salvation Science can only be non-sectarian. Ignorant,
wrathful divisions are a lie, which needs to be exposed.

Was Wright wrong? Take the polygraph test. Have you persecuted
Swamiji? Did you know Swamiji was persecuted? Did you enquire as to
why this boycott, this universally uniform insult, and persecution?
Did you seek to know more about why this was happening? Did you try
to stop it? Did you try to learn Swamiji's teachings?

Did you seek to find out why all this negative attention? Did you try
to find out what this "persona non-grata" was preaching?
I "guesstimate" that if you took the Lie Detector Test, it would
be "a hot day in hell". We might even find the real traitors who have
been like "the pot calling the kettle black".

The Lie Detector or Polygraph is also called a Psychogalvanometer. It
measures the sweat coming off the the fingers. When you lie, the
perspiration increases, causing greater electrical conductivity, thus
measuring your stress about having your hidden inner falsehoods or
iniquities exposed. And if you are Righteous, and have not done
wrong, you will confidently pass the test.

I "guesstimate" that the whole world would fail this trial about
one's honor and integrity. I have long sought respite from such
traitors - especially if there was little or no pressure to
intimidate, blackmail, or force them to do wrong. It would appear
that the world wants trouble and actually causes it, while denying
this truth.

In conclusion, it may be that Rev. Wright's contorversial statements
were completely justified, when considering how widespread evil is in
America. And if we can't change the home country, why complain about
the rest of the world, even if it is equally as evil? We must agree
with Rev. Wright, although his own explanation of such statements is
still inadequate.

In our coming complaints to the American Civil Liberties Union, we
anticipate that they will not admit that this theological high crime
against humanity is happening. Their employees, like almost all
Americans, when interrogated about their own inner corruption, will
experience the sweat from this "hot day in hell". Jai Om. - Sw.
Tantrasangha

Obama's Pastor: God Damn America, U.S. to Blame for 9/11
Obama's Pastor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Has a History of What Even
Obama's Campaign Aides Say Is 'Inflammatory Rhetoric'
By BRIAN ROSS and REHAB EL-BURI, March 13, 2008

Sen. Barack Obama's pastor says blacks should not sing "God Bless
America" but "God damn America."

Is Obama's Pastor a Liability? The Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Obama's
pastor for the last 20 years at the Trinity United Church of Christ
on Chicago's south side, has a long history of what even Obama's
campaign aides concede is "inflammatory rhetoric," including the
assertion that the United States brought on the 9/11 attacks with its
own "terrorism."

In a campaign appearance earlier this month, Sen. Obama said, "I
don't think my church is actually particularly controversial." He
said Rev. Wright "is like an old uncle who says things I don't always
agree with," telling a Jewish group that everyone has someone like
that in their family.

Rev. Wright married Obama and his wife Michelle, baptized their two
daughters and is credited by Obama for the title of his book, "The
Audacity of Hope."

An ABC News review of dozens of Rev. Wright's sermons, offered for
sale by the church, found repeated denunciations of the U.S. based on
what he described as his reading of the Gospels and the treatment of
black Americans.

"The government gives them the drugs, builds bigger prisons, passes a
three-strike law and then wants us to sing 'God Bless America.' No,
no, no, God damn America, that's in the Bible for killing innocent
people," he said in a 2003 sermon. "God damn America for treating our
citizens as less than human. God damn America for as long as she acts
like she is God and she is supreme."

In addition to damning America, he told his congregation on the
Sunday after Sept. 11, 2001 that the United States had brought on al
Qaeda's attacks because of its own terrorism.

"We bombed Hiroshima, we bombed Nagasaki, and we nuked far more than
the thousands (killed) in New York and the Pentagon, and we never
batted an eye," Rev. Wright said in a sermon on Sept. 16, 2001.

"We have supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and black
South Africans, and now we are indignant because the stuff we have
done overseas is now brought right back to our own front yards.
America's chickens are coming home to roost," he told his
congregation.

http://www.abcnews.go.com
http://www.salvationscience.com
------------------------------------------------------------------

LAST CALL TO TELL IT ALL: THE TANTRAYUDHA IS A TIME CAPSULE
RE: WORLD PEACE CAN ONLY COME FROM WITHIN US
http://www.salvationscience.com

If you have any message you want included in The Tantrayudha, post
it now. A moderator at one of Swamiji's groups answered our recent
message, entitiled: "WAS WRIGHT RIGHT? TAKE THE LIE DETECTOR TEST!".
She said that this message was off topic in a group dedicated to
medical freedom. Since her partner is a Major General, (so I don't
want to piss him off!), I did not attempt a rebuttal.

In the article below, note how the Americans don't care about our
eroding civil liberties. Imagine you are in a medical classroom and
someone jumps you from behind, wielding a butcher knife! You shout
to the class: "He's going to kill me!", and the teacher
replies: "That's off topic. In order to remain in the class you must
stay on topic. This class is about health."

Such a ridiculous event would, in fact, not be pro-health, but would
actually be against your health - from your own perspective, a
betrayal of life itself. Then you would understand why it is
impossible to Re-Engender Life among those who have already long ago
betrayed the Life Principle itself! Having betrayed the very Life
Principle, do you still imagine you are for it?

If this treasonous spirit, against the Longer, Happier Life, should
masquerade as pro-life and then somehow clone itself too many times,
you would achieve the devil's dream and the Saint's nightmare: a
world, which is subconsciously preparing for a mass murder-suicide!
Is it any wonder why Swamiji had to leave the so called "class on
health". It was only a fraudulent deception.

The fruition of your desires is only to the degree of your
commitment. The demonic religions are just like the medical
pretenders: They say one thing and do another. Is it any wonder that
all this talk about health, peace, Gnosis, Salvation, etc. goes on
forever without producing any tangible results? Saboteurs are
running the show, like what Jesus called "wolves in Lamb's clothing".

Get real about your "denial" of the Truth. You must understand that
your own lack of commitment and self-sacrifice has you in the insane
bipolar state or undoing what you profess to be doing! Swamiji finds
it impossible to teach Salvation Science to those known too have
long ignored or opposed the Life Principle. Like Jesus said: "You
will strain at flies and swallow camels".

You will strain to cure diseases and to extend your sorry lives
another ten years, while you reject, without any scientific
investigation through experimental research, the Life Principle
which, theoretically, could extend the lifetime of our physical
bodies indefinitely, with all the various curing of diseases and
happiness from increased health, which activates the Holy Spirit.

The whole world is like an animal! Therefore, as most of us already
know: The Gnosis in The Tantrayudha is not for the present
generation but for some future generation, perhaps in a life-and-
death struggle with famine and disease. And if they survive
such "Tribulations" by using our techniques, perhaps they might
continue the practice. When we die, we hope for the life of our
children.

This Inner Christ of Salvation from Suffering, by Way of a Longer,
Happier Life: This Genetic Rejuvenation - this Christ is my child,
my Christchild, for which I have labored long, and I pray to
Almighty Allah that this Resurrection, mentioned over a hundred
times in the Holy Koran, will survive forever. Please save from the
ignorant, throughout time, this Holy Divine Gnosis which Saves.

Below, look at the developments from having so long ignored or
opposed our Message: WORLD PEACE CAN ONLY HAPPEN FROM WITHIN. You
can patch a hole in a bald tire, but it will only blow out very
soon, unless you get a "complete retread". Only Physical Longevity
and Higher Consciousness can bring Peace. Below, look at the "can of
worms you have opened", by having opposed this Advent of Christ's
New Dispensation of Gnosis and persecuting its messengers. Jai Om. -
Sw. Tantrasangha

Do Americans Care About Big Brother?
By MASSIMO CALABRESI/WASHINGTON, Mon. Mar. 17, 2008
http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/20080317/us_time/doamericanscareaboutbig
brother

Pity America's poor civil libertarians. In recent weeks, the papers
have been full of stories about the warehousing of information on
Americans by the National Security Agency, the interception of
financial information by the CIA, the stripping of authority from a
civilian intelligence oversight board by the White House, and the
compilation of suspicious activity reports from banks by the
Treasury Department. On Thursday, Justice Department Inspector
General Glenn Fine released a report documenting continuing misuse
of Patriot Act powers by the FBI. And to judge from the reaction in
the country, nobody cares.

A quick tally of the record of civil liberties erosion in the United
States since 9/11 suggests that the majority of Americans are ready
to trade diminished privacy, and protection from search and seizure,
in exchange for the promise of increased protection of their
physical security. Polling consistently supports that conclusion,
and Congress has largely behaved accordingly, granting increased
leeway to law enforcement and the intelligence community to spy and
collect data on Americans. Even when the White House, the FBI or the
intelligence agencies have acted outside of laws protecting those
rights - such as the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act - the
public has by and large shrugged and, through their elected
representatives, suggested changing the laws to accommodate
activities that may be in breach of them.

Civil libertarians are in a state of despair. "People don't realize
how damaging it is to a democratic society to allow the government
to warehouse information about innocent Americans," says Mike
German, national security counsel at the American Civil Liberties
Union.

Or do they? In all the examples of diminished civil liberties, there
are few, if any, where the motivating factor was something other
than law and order or national security. There are no scandalous
examples of the White House using the Patriot Act powers for
political purposes or of individual agents using them for personal
gain. The Justice IG report released Thursday, for example, examined
some 50,000 National Security Letters issued in 2006 to see whether
the FBI misused that specialized kind of warrantless subpoena. The
IG found some continuing abuse of the power, but blamed it for the
most part on sloppiness and bad management, not nefarious intent. In
a press release accompanying the report, Fine said, "The FBI and
Department of Justice have shown a commitment to addressing these
problems."

There may, nonetheless, be reasons to feel wary of the civil
liberties vs. security trade-off into which Americans have bought.
If the misuse documented in the Justice IG report stems from
incompetence, Americans may not be getting the security they bargain
for in sacrificing their civil liberties. It's also possible the
Justice IG may yet find among the abused Patriot Act powers examples
of an FBI agent stalking his girlfriend or doing a favor for a
political operative friend. Fine is still preparing a report on the
illegal use of "exigent letters" in unauthorized demands for records
from business.

For now, however, civil libertarians will have to continue to argue
that the danger lies not in how the government's expanded powers are
being used now, but how they might be used in the future. "The
government can collect information about the average citizen without
any concern for their rights, but the citizen can't find out what
the government is doing, and that's inimical to government of we the
people," says the ACLU's German. So far, that argument hasn't
convinced the people. View this article on Time.com

http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/20080317/us_time/doamericanscareaboutbig
brother

http://www.salvationscience.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------

A NATION OF TRAITORS: FOLLIES OF SMART CROOKS AND THEIR DUMB SLAVES

DANNION'S WORLDVIEW
http://www.dannion.com/newsletters/08-03/index.htm

Hello Everyone,

Can you believe it, we've already arrived at the second week in the
month of March! Unfortunately, our American economy stays steady on
its course as it moves closer, and closer, to total collapse.
However, I want you to understand that this collapse has been
premeditated by "the powers that be". And what an ingenious (and
diabolical) plan it is! If we look back at the '70's, when the
economy teetered on the brink of failure, the same "powers that be"
decided they had to move the foundation of our society from a
savings-based economy to a spending-based economy. Therefore, they
had to convince us that the viability of our country's prosperity
was going to be consumer- based.

Well, guess what? They convinced us and we have spent, and spent,
and spent ourselves into overwhelming debt, and the government calls
it "economic growth"! But you see, this calculated demise of our
dollar has got to be put into place if they are going to be able to
remove it as the world's reserve currency. Only after this is
accomplished can they successfully bring about the formation of the
long awaited, One World Government. I know it is hard to swallow,
but our very own government is working against the people to destroy
our economy ,and collapse the dollar. Of this, there is not doubt!

Here's a point in fact - if you look at the big government bale-out
that's moving through Congress, it's all about giving you more money
to spend. It's not about paying down your present debt, nor is it
about adding to your savings accounts. Thus, the administration is
reinforcing consumer-based growth in our country. On top of this, we
are borrowing the money, the government is giving us to spend, from
the Pacific Rim countries. How crazy can we be? We simply must wake
up to the fact we are being set up by our own elected officials and
by those who manipulate them!

To worsen this aim, we have shipped all of our industrial jobs
overseas. They've given it a dolled up name; they call it
outsourcing. But no matter what you call it, it has rendered us
impotent, and left us with absolutely no economic base to fall back
on. The only two manufacturing bases we have left in this country
are the manufacturing of food (of which we are the world's leader)
and the automobile industry, and quite frankly, it's in the toilet!
Think of this: the only car completely manufactured in America today
is the Toyota Camry! To drive the nail deeper into the coffin, Alan
Greenspan, the longest serving head of the Federal Reserve, recently
took a trip to Dubai. While there, he urged the government of the
U.A.E to de-peg their currency from any association with the US
dollar, to reduce their own inflationary process. Yet, in reality,
it will only increase ours! Do you think he's looking out for
America?

Okay, here's another point for you to ponder: Where is the growth in
American jobs? Most of the jobs being created are low paying, jobs
in construction and unskilled labor, along with an inordinate amount
of government sector positions. As a matter of fact, the government
is employing more people than ever before. Could this be because in
order to better control the economy of America, by employing as many
civilians as possible, they can use it as a means of creating a
dictatorship? This is exactly the way Stalin gained control of the
Soviet Union back in the 1930's! Please research this, and come to
your own conclusions. See if you agree that we are being controlled
into the collapse of the United States of America, once the greatest
power ever to have existed in the modern world...

Here's one last log for the fire: last week the US and Canadian
military signed an agreement to help one another in cross-
controlling domestic violence and civil unrest. That means the
United States Army can travel into Canada, and the Canadian Army can
come across the American border, at will! This was once called,
invasion. Now, it is just a way of letting you know that the
government expects for there to be riots in the streets when we
realize our liberties are being taken away from us, one by one. And
we have to be robbed of all these liberties...

So, I beg you to keep this information in mind, and know that you
cannot get caught up in the coming events designed to distract us
from being strong in our spiritual selves. We must be diligent. We
have a chance to grow inwardly, by leaps and bounds. Please do not
miss this opportunity to realize the power and might you wield, as a
spiritual being ,in the throes of this human experience. These
events are only testing how well we will do! Yet, rest assured, we
will pass the test with flying colors as long as we remained focused
in our true identity.

With Purpose, Dannion
http://www.dannion.com/newsletters/08-03/index.htm
-----------------------------------------------------------------

A RETURN TO DR. JOSEPH ELDOR AND THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL
RE: URINE THERAPY FOR CANCER & INDIAN SHIVAMBU CLINICS
ALSO: URINE THERAPY IN THAILAND
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/cut
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/shivambu
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/NATURAL_CURES
http://www.salvationscience.com

Urotherapy for patients with cancer.
Eldor J., Theoretical Medicine Institute, Jerusalem, Israel.

Cancer cells release various antigens, some of which appear in the
urine. Oral autourotherapy is suggested as a new treatment modality
for cancer patients. It will provide the intestinal lymphatic system
with the many tumor antigens against which antibodies may be
produced. These antibodies may be pierced through the blood stream
and attack the tumor and its cells.

I would like to refer you to a message I sent recently regarding
clinics in India practicing Urotherapy:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/cut/message/1138

I wish you Good Health. Best regards, Joseph Eldor, MD
---------------------------------------------

THE URINE THERAPY CLINICS OF INDIA
Addresses of the Urine Therapy clinics of Mahabharata:

Dr. Mahesh V. Sanghavi
Shreeji Health Care Centre, 136/367, Pantnagar
Opp. Sangli Bank, Near Ghatkopar Station (E)
Mumbai400075
Phone: (Res.) 511 3564 (Clinic) 512 6038

Shri Jagdishbhai Shah
Nisargopchar Kendra, Vinoba Ashram, Gotri Road
Vodadara 390 001 Gujarat, Phone: 323280

Dr. Raj Upadhyaya
Shivambu Nature Cure Home, 68, Ichhanagar,
Jahagirpura, Surat 5, Phone: 85398

Dr. Sarang Patil
Samyak Holistic - Health Research Institute
Shivambu Bhavan, 13 Sane Guruji Vasahat
Washinaka Road, Kolhapur - 416 012
Phone: 0231 - 621565 / 621766
---------------------------------------------------------

URINE THERAPY IN THAILAND
Thais drink urine as alternative medicine
By Jill McGivering, BBC, Bangkok

At a busy and expensive alternative health centre in Bangkok, one
patient told of a remarkable cure.
In January she had an operation for colon cancer - but refused the
recommended chemotherapy.

Supporters say the practice has been followed for hundreds of years.

Now she says she has eliminated her cancer through diet, prayer - and
daily urine therapy.

"I started drinking my own urine after hearing from a monk that if
you have any kind of disease, urine drinking will help," she said.

Her doctor, Dr Banchob, started recommending urine therapy a few
months ago, instructing patients to collect their own urine in the
morning and drink it untreated, starting with small amounts and
progressing to a glassful a day.

He now says he has seen some remarkable cures - from cancer to back
pain.

It is a controversial claim and when Dr Banchob recently started
organising public seminars on the topic, it caused strong media
interest.

"In the ancient times or early days in the rural area, I think Thai
people practising this. But very personal. They don't open up their
secret to anybody. But after we discuss in the public, there's a
reaction from the public, pro and con," Dr Banchob said.

'Not recommended'

But in a modern private hospital in the capital Bangkok - where
conventional Western medicine and commercialism are practised -
kidney specialist Dr Siribha will not be advising her patients to
drink their own urine.

"If somebody asked my opinion, I will warn them not to do that," she
said.

Urine is the body's way of getting rid of things it doesn't want, she
says, and can contain harmful toxins.

"If something is too much and not useful in our body, then the body
will excrete in the urine or in the faeces or in a stool. The body
didn't want it any more. So I don't think it's a good idea to re-eat
or to re-drink the thing our body don't need it any more," she said.

If I had some sort of incurable disease, I suppose I might try it

Bangkok woman
Supporters of urine drinking say it has been practised in Thailand
for hundreds of years.

But officials at the government's Department of Thai Traditional and
Alternative Medicine say there is no record of the practice.

Deputy Director Dr Pennapa Subcharoen says she has tried to organise
research in the past, but can never find enough volunteers willing to
take part.

In the meantime, the department does not recommend it.

"Urine treatment is Chinese traditional medicine, and popular in
Japan and some traditional believe in India. I'm not sure it's
beneficial for the Thai people or not by such method, because there's
no paper or no clinical trials about this," she said.

Thailand's general public may still need some convincing. When we
went out to talk to shoppers one Saturday, many said that they had
heard about urine therapy, but not many were enthusiastic about
trying it themselves.

"I've read about it, but I'm not convinced. If I was ill, I'd rather
go to the doctor," one man said.

"I've heard about it on television but I only half believe in it. If
I had some sort of incurable disease, I suppose I might try it," a
woman said.

Many in Thailand's urban middle class are rediscovering traditional
and alternative medicine - but urine therapy, it seems, is still to
catch on.
-----------------------------------------------------

Urotherapy for patients with cancer

J. Eldor, Theoretical Medicine Institute,
P. O. Box 12142, Jerusalem, 91120, Israel
Received 7 March 1995; accepted 7 May 1996.
Available online 20 December, 2004.

Abstract
Cancer cells release various antigens, some of which appear in the
urine. Oral autourotherapy is suggested as a new treatment modality
for cancer patients. It will provide the intestinal lymphatic system
with the many tumor antigens against which antibodies may be
produced. These antibodies may be pierced through the blood stream
and attack the tumor and its cells.

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/cut
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/shivambu
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/NATURAL_CURES
http://www.salvationscience.com/
--------------------------------------------------------------------

UNNECESSARY TOXINS: HOW THE ECONOMIC SYSTEM IS KILLING YOU
RE: HARMFUL GENETIC MUTATIONS FROM THE DILUTION AND POLLUTION OF
BIOPLASMA, LEADING TO MITOCHONDRIAL MUTAGENESIS AS DISEASE AND
PREMATURE SENESCENCE http://www.salvationscience.com

This is a brief list of toxins: vaccines, pharmaceutical allopathic
medicines, antibiotics, alcohol, caffeine, sugar, food additives,
microwaves, artificial sweeteners, fluoridated-chlorinated water,
plastics, herbicides, pesticides, mercury, lead, aluminum,
artificial fertilizers, carbonated air and water, and radiation or
radiated things. One should fast from "mutant nutrients" and eat and
drink as much Genetic Efflux as possible.

Avoid contaminants, for such toxins could destroy your efforts to
attain the much-desired state of Genetic Rejuvenation. The ancients
called Genetic Efflux, such as urine, "Soma Pavamana". Pavamana
means "pure food", and it is the Biblical "Manna from Heaven",
whereby the "Chosen People" survived famine and plague, by Way of
eating and drinking that which reinforced their own DNA Genome or
Genetic Code, and eschewing that which did not.

The ancient Satapatha Brahmana (True Path of God) calls
urine "seed", because of its Regenerative powers. Like a wise man
once said: "It is not time, but water, which wears away the
(Philosophers') Stone." Buddha called it the "thirst of Samsara" -
not only implying materialism, but also the overloading of the body
with liquid dilution (and solids). Like the Bible saith: "Break the
fast and ye will die the death"! Jai Om. - Sw. Tantrasangha

File name: Syringe_of_Death.doc
http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/docs/Syringe_of_death.pdf

"The Syringe of Death": Coming Soon to a Police Station Near You

Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org

Senator Richard Burr (R-NC) thinks he owns your body. If he's right,
you will have no say over what gets injected into it and no recourse
under the law if it harms or kills you. That is, if Burr gets what
he's after and S. 1873 passes the US Senate. Burr's
bill, "Biodefense and Pandemic Vaccine and Drug Development Act of
2005", establishes the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development
Agency (BARDA), a secretive and secret agency exempt from public
scrutiny, the Freedom of Information Act and the Federal Advisory
Committee Act. BARDA will be the only agency which can declare a
pandemic condition and may do so for any (or no) reason. Operating
in secret, BARDA will be responsible for the advanced research and
development of drugs and vaccines (in partnership with
pharmaceutical companies), and, because the contents of those
vaccines will remain shrouded in BARDA darkness, any injuries and
deaths caused by drugs and vaccines which BARDA
labels "countermeasures" to any BARDA-declared threat may never be
known.

Even if those contents do become known, S. 1873 cancels any
manufacturer liability for the companies that made the vaccines or
drugs. Injured parties will have no legal means of securing
compensation from either the government or the companies themselves.
And BARDA can declare a pandemic (at any time) and require mandatory
universal forced vaccination.

Can we assume that these vaccines will provide us any protection at
all? Perhaps, but it's not likely. First, clearly understand that
under BARDA you may be (legally) subjected to experimental drugs –
drugs which have no track record at all – and, second, with or
without the advent of BARDA, it is now more important than ever that
the real truth about vaccines be widely and quickly disseminated.
There are reported to be more than 200 new vaccines "in the
pipeline". If they, along with the ones in use now, are not safe,
we, and our children, are not safe.

All of us have been carefully conditioned to believe that vaccines
are safe. But the truth is ugly and, with BARDA staring us in the
face, more than a little frightening. Here are the cold, hard facts:

Cold, Hard Fact # 1: Vaccines are not safe: vaccines are dangerous.
The evidence is abundant that the tragic cost of loading babies and
children up with toxic brews of mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde,
injected foreign protein, stealth viruses and, in the second
generation vaccines, the deadly immune enhancer squalene, is
unacceptably high. Lives are ruined and lost in these children when
toxins overwhelm their immune systems and brains and cause tragic,
totally preventable suffering and death. Autism (occurring in 4
children per 10,000 when I graduated from medical school in 1970)
now afflicts a minimum of 1 child in 168 in the US. Children have
not changed: the poisons we give them have. Gulf War Syndrome, a
pervasive, progressive, deadly auto-immune disease afflicting over
half a million US veterans, appears to be a deadly vaccine reaction
to an experimental vaccine (Anthrax) which the US used on soldiers
without their consent in clear violation of the Helsinki Declaration
and the Nuremberg Protocols, international conventions and
agreements which prohibit human experimentation without full,
informed consent.

The concept of informed consent, is, of course, is meaningless in
the face of compulsory vaccination with secret ingredients and no
manufacturer accountability. Contaminants make vaccines tremendously
dangerous. Swine flu (for a pandemic which never materialized) was
contaminated with polio virus in 1976. Over 45 million Americans
were vaccinated in just 77 days and although there were only 6 cases
of Swine flu in the entire country the vaccine reportedly caused at
least 565 cases of polio paralysis (renamed "Guillain-Barre
Syndrome" for the occasion), 60 deaths and other serious problems,
including blindness and impotence. (There is no reason to feel
reassured because this particular disaster occurred in the past:
every flu vaccine is capable of passing along Guillain-Barre (polio)
and other unsuspected viral diseases.)

Cold, Hard Fact # 2: Vaccines have not eradicated diseases: vaccines
spread diseases. Attenuated viruses (infective, weakened versions of
the dangerous ones) are commonly used in vaccines so that your body
will develop an immune `memory' for that virus. The next time your
immune system meets that specific virus, it rapidly combats it by
producing large numbers of antibodies. This practice and theory
derive from the dawn of vaccination: Edward Jenner's pioneering use
of cowpox pus inoculations to eliminate smallpox. This innovative
and surprising medical treatment is touted as one of the triumphs of
modern medicine. It makes a wonderful story but, in fact,
inoculation not only spread smallpox, it caused well-documented
epidemics of syphilis and leprosy in inoculated people, especially
babies (who have immature immune systems). In spite of the
documented associated dangers of leprosy, syphilis, smallpox, death
and blindness, England provided free vaccination in 1840, made it
compulsory in 1853, and punished lack of vaccination with seizure of
property and imprisonment in 1857 (which should sound familiar). It
took a British Royal Commission some 41 years more to put a stop to
the deaths and disease that Jenner's unproven technique caused.
Finally, in 1898, England's compulsory smallpox vaccination laws
were overturned.

In 1854, the first year of British compulsory vaccination, deaths
from syphilis in infants under 1 year increased by 50% and continued
to rise steadily after that. In 1802 Jenner was paid 10,000 pounds
by the House of Commons. Shortly afterwards, it became clear that
vaccines did not work. Rather than lose face, the House of Commons
granted Jenner another 20,000 pounds in 1807 and 3,000 pounds a year
thereafter.

Jenner knew that milk maids who milked with active pus-filled sores
on their hands transmitted pox to their cows. Local superstition
held that the cow's pus was a preventive against small pox. Jennings
learned from a local farmer, Benjamin Jestey, that he had inoculated
his wife and 3 children with cowpox pus by jabbing them with a
darning needle and they did not contract small pox. Jenner assumed
that this meant they were protected against smallpox. To the modern
ear this is absurd. In Jenner's day,neither methodology nor the
scientific method were part of the culture.

Jenner, a village apothecary who purchased a University of Edinburgh
MD for 15 pounds, was a showman who made much of his "discovery" and
hastened to induce Sarah Nelmes, a young milk maid with a fresh
lesion on her finger, to allow him to collect pus from her sore. He
inoculated an 8 year old named James Phipps who developed a fever
and a pustule on his skin. Seventeen days later he inoculated the
boy again, this time with small pox. Since the boy did not develop
smallpox, Jenner concluded that "protection was complete".

Jenner hawked his inoculation but people started to complain because
they were developing smallpox (and syphilis) after vaccination with
Jenner's cowpox. Jenner switched to infected material from horses'
heels instead ("Horse-grease"). John Baker, the child he inoculated
with horse-grease, however, died before he could expose him to small
pox. Undeterred, he inoculated 6 more children with horse-grease and
was so convinced that the results would be positive that he rushed
to London to publish them before there were any results. The
[untested] "success" of James Phipps' inoculation and his London
paper established Jenner's method and his success. Revolted by the
idea of horse-grease inoculations, people demanded cowpox
inoculations again. Jenner complied.

But just what is cow pox? In tropical countries it is cutaneous
smallpox plus leprosy (a non-lethal disease often present along with
leprosy) while in more moderate climates the milk maids were
transferring syphilis to the cattle along with their cutaneous
smallpox. Jenner was making his brew from the cowpox pus and the
results were nothing short of disastrous for untold numbers of
people.

Modern small pox vaccines are produced in much the same way: lesions
are induced on the skin of calves and, after they are "sacrificed"
[and sold for veal?], the harvested material from their lesions is
cultured in eggs and prepared as vaccines.

However, although immunity fails to develop more than 80% of the
time, serious side effects are distressingly common from the modern
small pox vaccines: At least 52 people out of every million will
have life threatening events and 1-2 will die. Permanent damage to
heart, brain, skin and GI effects are also well known side effects.
The Center for Disease Control (CDC) notes that serious side effects
and dangers probably occur much more often since many people can be
harmed by live virus vaccines: immune compromised people (on
steroids, with eczema or psoriasis, nursing babies, pregnant women
and their fetuses, people with HIV/AIDs, transplant patients,
chemotherapy and radiation patients, people with auto-immune
diseases, young children, asthmatics, etc.) are at serious risk for
contracting the same disease that the inoculation is designed to
prevent or worse.

In the US, the CDC classifies more than 60 million people as immune
compromised. People who are re-inoculated after many years are
particularly susceptible to severe and life threatening reactions.
Those who are ill are likely to develop sever effects as well.

In fact, Tommy Thompson, former Health and Human Services boss, said
that he would not take the vaccine although the US is stock
piling "a dose of smallpox vaccine with every American's name on
it". Perhaps the one with his name has been changed so it reads, "To
Whom It May Concern". S. 1873 and BARDA would, according to its
proponents, allow absolutely no exemptions for medical conditions or
personal conviction. None.

Dr. Mike Lane, former director of the CDC's so-called "smallpox
eradication program" in the 1970's, is a proponent of mass
vaccination with no exemptions saying, "Medical contraindications
would not apply… there would be NO exceptions. [In India] I'm sure
that we killed a few people, but we did the best that we could….If
the person is exposed there will be no exemptions, medical or
otherwise."

When a live virus is used in the vaccine, infective virus is shed
for anywhere from 4 to 21 days (or more) and, during that time,
inoculated persons can give the disease, or the side effects of the
inoculation, to any vulnerable person they come into contact with.
So, while it may be true that vaccines have spread disease, isn't it
true that vaccines have eliminated the epidemic diseases of the
past? No, actually they have not. Neither

Jenner's cowpox inoculation nor modern smallpox inoculation did
anything to eliminate smallpox (quite the contrary). The fact is,
Dr. Charles A. R. Campbell discovered that smallpox is transmitted
by the flying bedbug, Cimex lectularius, and that eliminating this
parasitic insect from human habitation eliminates smallpox, too.
Personal hygiene and better housekeeping eliminated the deadly
scourge. (Dr. Campbell also discovered that the disfiguring pocks of
the disease could be prevented by a diet high in Vitamin C.)

When the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the
planet "smallpox free" in 1980, they did so administratively, not
medically: small pox incidence was reduced, but not gone, despite
nearly universal vaccination. What to do? WHO solved the problem
cleverly: they renamed the disease "cowpox" and "monkey pox".
Shazam: a smallpox free planet, quicker than you can say, "Junk
Science!"

Other epidemic diseases were in sharp decline at the end of the 19th
and early 20th centuries as a direct consequence of improved hygiene
and other life-style changes. Measles, Diphtheria, Whooping Cough,
Polio and Hepatitis B were all in sharp decline long before vaccines
were introduced. The contribution to the decline made by vaccines,
however, was negligible or non-existent. Scarlet Fever, typhoid
fever and cholera, for which inoculation either did not exist or was
never wide-spread, declined on the same sharp curve for the same
reasons. So do we need inoculations because of the public health
hazard? Despite the considerable hype, in fact, there is no unbiased
evidence which connects disease prevention with inoculation.

Cold, Hard Fact # 3: Flu vaccines do not protect people from flu-
related deaths. The CDC claims that an astonishing 36,000 people die
from flu in an average year. But according to the former Secretary
of Health and Human Services, Tommy Thompson, 68 people under 65 die
from flu each year in the US. The truth is that in 4 years, a total
4,440 people, mostly elderly, died from flu, no where near the CDC's
touted 144,000 deaths. While that figure is great for flu vaccine
sales, it derivers not from reality but from the CDC's industry-
friendly statistical trick of classifying all pneumonia-related
deaths, despite any lack of evidence, as flu deaths. Discussing this
nonsense, Lone Simonsen of the National Institute of Allergy and
Infectious Disease/NIH, writes in The Archives of Internal
Medicine "We could not correlate increasing vaccination coverage
after 1980 with declining mortality rates in any age group. Because
fewer than 10% of all winter deaths were attributable to influenza
in any season, we conclude that observational studies substantially
overestimate vaccination benefit."1

Cold, Hard Fact # 4: Potential pandemic viral diseases like the Bird
Flu do not have safe and effective vaccines to prevent them and
there are no drugs to treat them effectively. Despite that fact, on
September 15, 2005 the US purchased $100 Million of a French
experimental flu vaccine designed to protect against bird flu. It's
so experimental, in fact, that although we have purchased megabucks
worth of the stuff, the French manufacturer, Sanofi-Pasteur, is
planning to experiment with adjutants (immune response enhancers) to
rev up human response to it. Perhaps the adjuvant is the same one
that the Army used in the deadly Vaccine A against anthrax: